data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e015/6e015cdd61e0c954c747793687a3c9ed1948beb4" alt=""
KUCHING: Putrajaya’s continued resistance to Sarawak’s demand for greater control over its resources is deeply concerning.
As Premier Sarawak Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg and GPS fight tirelessly to assert Sarawak’s rightful authority over its natural wealth, it is regrettable that Sarawakian opposition leader Chong Chieng Jen has chosen this moment to criticize GPS rather than standing in solidarity with his home state.
“If, as Chong suggests, Sarawak’s resources are at risk – if Putrajaya continues to resist Sarawak’s push for greater autonomy – then where do he and DAP Sarawak truly stand?” questioned Batu Kitang State Assemblyman, Dato Ir. Lo Khere Chiang.
“Chong is not just any politician – he is a federal member of parliament (MP), a senior member of Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Harapan (PH), and part of the Unity Government.
“This places him in a unique position, with direct access to key decision-makers in Putrajaya.
“Yet, rather than using this platform to advocate for Sarawak’s rights, he appears more focused on attacking Abang Johari and GPS—the very leaders working to strengthen Sarawak’s position.
“By doing so, Chong risks weakening Sarawak’s bargaining power. If he is truly committed to defending Sarawak’s interests, why not leverage his federal influence to push for meaningful dialogue? Why not work towards securing Sarawak’s rightful stake in its own resources instead of undermining those actively fighting for it?” said Lo.
Now, more than ever, Chong should stand with GPS and Abang Jo – not against them. As a lawyer and politician, he has both the expertise and platform to champion Sarawak’s cause at the federal level. Instead of deepening political divisions, he should help reinforce Sarawak’s case.
“Persistent criticism of GPS at this juncture only plays into Putrajaya’s hands,” Lo added.
This is a critical moment. Abang Jo has been clear about Sarawak’s role as the sole gas aggregator for the state, and the Sarawak government has issued formal statements reinforcing this position.
Yet, challenges remain.
The fight for greater control over Sarawak’s resources is complex, and unity among Sarawakian leaders is crucial.
Chong and DAP Sarawak should stop repeating the same tired accusations, blaming GPS leaders for decisions made under Barisan Nasional (BN).
“How old were most of the present GPS leaders when the Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 was passed? Some were young politicians, while others were just kids! History cannot be changed – but the future can be fought for. That is exactly what GPS is doing today,” said Lo.
Sarawak has never sought to disrupt existing contracts with Petronas or international investors.
The GPS government has consistently maintained that Sarawak’s authority over its oil and gas remains intact, despite the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA74).
Sarawak understands the need for PDA74 to coexist with the Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 (OMO58) to ensure stability.
However, under the Sarawak Sales Tax Ordinance and in line with OMO58, Petronas is required to remit a 5 percent sales tax on petroleum products to Sarawak, as affirmed by the Federal Court in 2020.
This reinforces Sarawak’s authority to impose fiscal measures on its resources while maintaining investor confidence.
“Abang Jo and GPS have remained steadfast in defending Sarawak’s rights. It has not been easy, and it will only get harder.
“Now is the time for unity. Every Sarawakian leader, regardless of political affiliation, must set aside party politics and work together to protect Sarawak’s interests,” urged Lo.
“This is bigger than political rivalry – this is about Sarawak’s future. Do the right thing – stand with GPS. Stand with Sarawak,” he concluded.
By Connie Chieng